{"id":100302,"date":"2026-01-12T15:54:20","date_gmt":"2026-01-12T14:54:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/?p=100302"},"modified":"2026-01-12T16:02:59","modified_gmt":"2026-01-12T15:02:59","slug":"de-onraad-van-toezicht-white-paper-sjarel-ex-stelt-diagnose-maar-stokt-bij-oplossing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/2026\/01\/de-onraad-van-toezicht-white-paper-sjarel-ex-stelt-diagnose-maar-stokt-bij-oplossing\/","title":{"rendered":"The treachery of supervision - white paper Sjarel Ex diagnoses but stalls on solution.\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

On Friday 16 January, a team led by Sjarel Ex will present a long-awaited report on the future of supervisory boards in the cultural sector. With Jaap van Manen and Mark Micha\u00ebla, Ex conducted a year and a half of research and held dozens of interviews. This led to seven painfully recognisable scenarios in their \u2018white paper\u2019 \u2018The treachery of supervision\u2019. The diagnosis is rock-hard: \u2018supervisory boards of cultural institutions are in practice untouchable\u2019<\/em> and \u2018Supervisory boards\u2019 self-cleansing ability falls short'.\u2019<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Anyone hoping for a few peppery recommendations after 36 pages of analysis will come home from a cold shower. Nothing urgent. We read: \u2018there is a need\u2019<\/em> and \u2018it deserves consideration\u2019<\/em>. Sharp observations evaporate into vague policy formulations. Someone here in the office shouted: \u2018this is a band-aid on a broken leg<\/em>'. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 17 years of Culture Press, we have seen it many times: hassles at cultural institutions where supervision, in particular, fails. Whether it was theatre boards with gift cards and Icelandic investments<\/a> goes, a bankrupt theatre<\/a> in Groningen, a opera in Enschede<\/a>, a orchestra in eastern Netherlands<\/a>, a devastated corporate culture<\/a> in Amsterdam or a photography museum dismissing its director: invariably raised eyebrows. Not a common occurrence, but too common to keep the industry's reputation good. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Perfect analysis<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The pleasantly readable white paper has collected a few nice cases, all of which are treated in a reasonably anonymous manner. They are situations where the supervisory board, for example, does not properly understand its role as employer. We see members drawing powers to themselves without accepting managerial responsibility. Sometimes the supervisory board has taken the board's seat. So says the white paper: \u2018why not build mediation into the code as a mandatory intermediate step, to avoid far too large irreparable steps?\u2019<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

That is just not what the conclusions and recommendations say. There it says only that the sector should \u2018reconsider\u2019 separating employer and sounding board roles. How then? By whom? When? No more word on compulsory mediation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Government as elephant in the room<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Another: the role of government. Ex cs spend more than three pages on the \u2018invisible hand\u2019 of subsidy providers who operate outside the code but do exercise power. \u2018An omission in the current code is that virtually nothing is said about the role and room for manoeuvre of the government either; this is a source of tension for both governance and supervision.\u2019 That analysis, too, is crystal clear. But then, in the conclusions and recommendations, we read: \u2018It is recommended that the responsibility of the government be given a place in the code.\u2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n

About the \u2018how?\u2019 you read nothing at all. The report is completely silent on what powers the government should or should not have. When is a municipality allowed to intervene in a theatre, and when not?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Opposition?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

It seems that the authors encountered opposition during their research. Those who know Sjarel Ex a little will not recognise him in the moderate tone of the white paper. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Appended to the white paper are seven scenarios, which have much sharper analyses than the conclusions are. Take scenario 3: a chairman of a supervisory board who does not tolerate dissent, where other members do not have the courage to object to his reappointment. Or scenario 7: a supervisory board that loses control after allegations of inappropriate behaviour and sees the only option as being to resign collectively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Such examples cry out for concrete solutions. But they are not coming. We read: \u2018A possible solution could lie in: professional self-evaluation with external guidance<\/em>.'<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion not included<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thus, the strongest conclusion of the entire report is also not in the conclusions at all. Tucked away in chapter 7, the authors write: \u2018When developing measures for governance and supervision in cultural institutions, the risk of these institutions becoming a plaything of unreliable politics should be taken into account.<\/em>\u2019 I would have started the white paper with it. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Three months ago, the Culture Council published its opinion \u2018\u2019Supervision in the cultural sector: an art in itself'<\/a>. That was a lot more concrete. The Culture Council said: large organisations at least five members on the supervisory board.<\/em> The white paper says: the legal minimum of three is insufficient for large organisations, five would be more appropriate.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mumbling<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Culture Council says: a maximum of five supervisory positions per person, chairmanships count for two. The white paper mutters: \u2018The council thinks the sector should mirror this legal regulation.\u2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The white paper appears three months after the SB opinion, but is thus more vague in its recommendations. Quite remarkable. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Friday 17 January, the authors will present their report in a meeting in Amsterdam. Then everyone will nod in agreement and say we need to talk about this further. In a year's time, there will be another report. Isn't it time to make choices? Those choices are already there, but they are strangely not explicit in the white paper. Let me kick-start the discussion on Friday with the following four statements: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mediation should become mandatory before a supervisory board can suspend a director. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The question is not whether mediation is useful - the question is who organises it, who pays for it, and what happens if a supervisory board refuses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Formalise the role of government.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Should there be a separate chapter in the Governance Code on the rules of the game for public authorities? Or will this remain a grey area?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Small institutions are required to move away from the supervisory board model.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is a glaring shortage of supervisors and the checks and balances are disproportionately burdensome. The alternative is for several small institutions to share one supervisory board.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Provide monitoring committee with teeth. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Question is just who and where. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Time is running out<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

We have had a few years of political stagnation, and as long as the BBB is about culture, \u2018delay\u2019 and \u2018research\u2019 will be the strongest response there too. The ministry of OCW does need to come up with a response, because before you know it, we will be stuck with a new system to which nothing can be changed for eight years. Whatever cabinet is in place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The white paper could have been a wake-up call. The authors invested a year and a half, they had access to directors and supervisors who are rarely so open, they collected scenarios that describe the pain points tangentially. But the vagueness of the conclusions makes it a report that anyone can endorse without changing anything.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read the whitepaper here.<\/p>\n\n\n

Report-The-Council-of-Supervision<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Vrijdag 16 januari presenteert een team onder leiding van Sjarel Ex een langverwacht rapport over de toekomst van de Raad van Toezicht in de culturele sector. Met Jaap van Manen en Mark Micha\u00ebla deed Ex anderhalf jaar onderzoek en voerde tientallen gesprekken. Dat leidde tot zeven pijnlijk herkenbare scenario’s in hun \u2018whitepaper\u2019 ‘De onraad van […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_eb_attr":"","_themeisle_gutenberg_block_has_review":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":true,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":3,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"federated","footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1,15614,11687],"tags":[15891,11620,5756],"class_list":["post-100302","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nieuws","category-beleid","category-donatie-gevraagd","tag-code-cultural-governance","tag-kunstenplan","tag-raad-van-toezicht"],"featured_image_url":[],"post_author":"Wijbrand Schaap","assigned_categories":"ACTUEEL, beleid, WAARDEER & DONEER!","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":140332,"url":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/2026\/09\/straks-moeten-we-nog-bewijzen-dat-we-mensen-zijn-een-dialoog-over-journalistiek-en-ai\/","url_meta":{"origin":100302,"position":0},"title":"Soon we\u2019ll have to prove we\u2019re human: a dialogue on journalism and AI","author":"Guido van Nispen","date":"25 September 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"We read a novel, appreciate an opinion piece and rely on our own judgement, until an AI detector attaches a suspicious percentage to it. The work hasn\u2019t changed, but our perspective has. What will happen when the machine ultimately determines what we, as humans, still trust?","rel":"","context":"In "LITERAIR"","block_context":{"text":"LITERAIR","link":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/genre\/literatuur-2\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":137595,"url":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/2026\/09\/na-het-paradisodebat-we-moeten-anders-gaan-denken-over-auteursrecht\/","url_meta":{"origin":100302,"position":1},"title":"Following the #Paradiso debate: We need to start thinking differently about copyright","author":"Nan van Houte","date":"6 September 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"I\u2019ve just left Paradiso, where this year\u2019s annual Kunsten\u201992 debate was devoted to AI. What struck me was that, apart from the question or comment from the balcony at Paradiso \u2013 which, unfortunately, was impossible to hear without amplification \u2013 no attention was paid to the extremely interesting observations and recommendations made by Payal Arora, Professor of Inclusive\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "ACTUEEL"","block_context":{"text":"ACTUEEL","link":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/genre\/nieuws\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":137614,"url":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/2026\/09\/mijn-hart-in-vijftig-stukken-el-corazon-de-ester\/","url_meta":{"origin":100302,"position":2},"title":"My Heart in Fifty Pieces: El coraz\u00f3n de Ester","author":"Alessia De Santis","date":"7 September 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"In *El coraz\u00f3n de Ester*, which had its Italian national premiere at the Teatro Vittoria as part of Short Theatre 2026, the Spanish artist Alberto Cort\u00e9s takes on the role of Ester, a 19th-century woman who slowly fades away as she surrenders herself to her lovers. There are only fifty performances\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "FAITS DIVERS"","block_context":{"text":"FAITS DIVERS","link":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/genre\/faits-divers\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":90844,"url":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/2023\/06\/streamingdiensten-gaan-5-omzet-investeren-in-nederlandse-producties\/","url_meta":{"origin":100302,"position":3},"title":"Streaming services to invest 5% turnover in Dutch productions","author":"een van onze leden","date":"6 June 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Major streaming services operating in the Netherlands will start investing 5% of their Dutch annual turnover in Dutch productions. The House of Representatives has agreed to a bill by state secretary Gunay Uslu (Culture and Media). Thanks to this investment, more money will be available for making Dutch offerings. With...","rel":"","context":"In "beleid"","block_context":{"text":"beleid","link":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/genre\/beleid\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Logo van het ministerie van OCW","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Logo_ministerie_OCW.svg_.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Logo_ministerie_OCW.svg_.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Logo_ministerie_OCW.svg_.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Logo_ministerie_OCW.svg_.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Logo_ministerie_OCW.svg_.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":90533,"url":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/2023\/04\/stairway-to-music-scala-for-ernestine-zaterdag-27-mei\/","url_meta":{"origin":100302,"position":4},"title":"Stairway to Music - Scala for Ernestine - Saturday 27 May","author":"een van onze leden","date":"26 April 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Stairway to Music, a programme by Asko|Sch\u00f6nberg and the Muziekgebouw, is an intimate listening experience of about 45 minutes on the steps of the Muziekgebouw. This time the program also has a personal touch. Harpist Ernestine Stoop says goodbye to Asko|Sch\u00f6nberg after more than 40 years and has put together...","rel":"","context":"In "MUZIEK"","block_context":{"text":"MUZIEK","link":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/genre\/podiumkunst\/muziek-podiumkunst-2\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Ernestine Stoop - beeld geleverd door Asko|Sch\u00f6nberg","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/image002.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/image002.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/image002.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/image002.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":19297,"url":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/2015\/01\/another-black-day-for-independent-journalism\/","url_meta":{"origin":100302,"position":5},"title":"Another black day for independent journalism","author":"Thea Derks","date":"8 January 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"After the brutal attack on the staff of the French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo in Paris yesterday, journalists, cartoonists, politicians and the general public rallied worldwide to defend the freedom of speech. Many a front page of today's newspapers showed the cartoons for which chief editor Charb (St\u00e9phane Charbonnier) and...","rel":"","context":"In "ACTUEEL"","block_context":{"text":"ACTUEEL","link":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/genre\/nieuws\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"tirannen","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/tirannen1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3yKke-q5M","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100302","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=100302"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100302\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":100309,"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100302\/revisions\/100309"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=100302"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=100302"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=100302"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}