{"id":122993,"date":"2026-06-30T11:24:46","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T09:24:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/?p=122993"},"modified":"2026-06-30T16:56:20","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T14:56:20","slug":"anonieme-bronnen-primeurs-en-aanhalingstekens-de-dilemmas-van-de-cultuurjournalist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/2026\/06\/anonieme-bronnen-primeurs-en-aanhalingstekens-de-dilemmas-van-de-cultuurjournalist\/","title":{"rendered":"Anonymous sources, scoops and \u2018quotations\u2019: the dilemmas of the \u2018culture journalist\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"

Updated at 16:29 concerning the amount of compensation.<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

When a judge considers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article about the court's ruling, which is also damning for the Volkskrant, was written by the same reporter who previously wrote an article that caused this trouble. An article, according to the Council for Journalism, that was poorly substantiated (but indeed \u2018balanced\u2019), based on accounts from two former employees of the Photography Museum. The reporter has now, in reporting the court's decision, pressed the quotation mark button so many times that even Wierd Duk, specialist in that genre<\/a>, would be ashamed of it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2018We know better\u2019<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

But with quotation marks used in such a great quantity, you cast doubt on every statement: \u201cit's the judge who thinks this, she'll have her reasons, but we know better.\u201d This becomes explicit when it concerns app-based communication in which the director, who was completely vindicated, allegedly behaved in an inappropriate manner. De Volkskrant reported on this in a rather flimsy follow-up, but no one produced screenshots as proof.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If there is no proof, it didn't happen, but the Volkskrant is now factually reopening the case, by stating that the newspaper has seen that proof. That seems legally problematic, to say the least, because then you'll have to demonstrate that. The fact that the newspaper does not do that, but only repeats the accusation and thus completely questions the judge's verdict, is stupid, but also very bad for trust in the rule of law. That is much worse.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hardened old man<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The entire article could be dismissed as the work of a \u2018boresome old man\u2019 feeling put out, but this is going too far: when you call the judiciary into question to such an extent, and thereby still discredit the party that won their case, a defamation charge is certainly something to consider. For the party that was discredited. <\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"
The article in de Volkskrant<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

What the Volkskrant is now also doing is undermining trust in journalism. When a journalist is deceived by their sources, they have no story and must face the consequences. It happens to the best, and it often happens that you are exploited by people with their own agenda. That is painful, but it also makes you better, more careful, and more reliable. So be it, less sensation, but society benefits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

4 tonnes?!<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The question remains whether the compensation of \u00a3400,000 for the dismissed director will not lead to invidious comparisons. If that is indeed two gross annual salaries, director Donker, with the approval of the Supervisory Board that was proven wrong, was well above the norm, in a sector that is already struggling. Even if we deduct half a ton for legal costs. For example, it is twenty times the gross annual turnover of this culture correspondent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Correction 30-06-26, 16:29<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

However, it is now clear that this amounts to two annual salaries of just under \u00a3150,000, plus legal costs of over \u00a3100,000. Both figures are more in line with what is customary in the sector. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read more here about: A cap on top incomes?<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, we want Birgit Donker to receive compensation, but then the conversation about the enormous income disparities in the cultural sector must be had. And, incidentally, not just in the cultural sector. Because the fact that even with an income of \u00a3200,000 per year you can still be laughed at by the CEOs of companies you approach for sponsorship is painful enough.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read our previous reporting on the Donker case here: https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/?s=birgit%20donker<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Wanneer de rechter iets niet bewezen acht, en niemand in hoger beroep gaat, is iets dus ook niet gebeurd. Deze waarheid als een koe staat de laatste jaren best vaak onder druk, en dat is eng. Want vaak staat die formulering ‘niet bewezen’ ook bij de berichtgeving in de media, tussen aanhalingstekens. Zoals nu in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_eb_attr":"","_themeisle_gutenberg_block_has_review":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":3,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"federated","wpai_meta_description":"","footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[15614,16518,9563,11687],"tags":[16449,16554,5756],"class_list":["post-122993","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-beleid","category-featured","category-fotografie","category-donatie-gevraagd","tag-birgit-donker","tag-nederlands-fotomuseum","tag-raad-van-toezicht"],"views":4426,"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":101058,"url":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/2026\/03\/fotomuseum-soap-2-het-wereldje-is-klein-de-egos-groot\/","url_meta":{"origin":122993,"position":0},"title":"Fotomuseum soap #2: \u2018The world is small, the egos big\u2019","author":"Wijbrand Schaap","date":"27 March 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Last weekend, the Volkskrant published from a confidential investigation into the Nederlands Fotomuseum. That article, which again made (only) two accusations of cross-border behaviour against the sacked director Birgit Donker, caused some controversy. On Sunday, we got hold of the letter by which the Supervisory Board dismissed staff members in...","rel":"","context":"In "beleid"","block_context":{"text":"beleid","link":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/genre\/beleid\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":123108,"url":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/2026\/07\/na-het-vonnis-over-het-fotomuseum-begint-de-echte-bestuursvraag\/","url_meta":{"origin":122993,"position":1},"title":"After the verdict on the Photomuseum, the real governance question begins","author":"Guido van Nispen","date":"1 July 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Guido van Nispen: At first glance, the judgement in the case involving former director Birgit Donker appears to mark the conclusion of a long-running labour dispute. But its significance extends much further. The court was exceptionally critical of the actions of the Supervisory Board of the Nederlands Fotomuseum\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "beleid"","block_context":{"text":"beleid","link":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/genre\/beleid\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":112193,"url":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/2026\/05\/er-zijn-alleen-verliezers-toezicht-zonder-zichtbaar-toezicht\/","url_meta":{"origin":122993,"position":2},"title":"\u201cThere are only losers\u201d Surveillance without visible oversight","author":"Guido van Nispen","date":"25 May 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"A court case over Birgit Donker's dismissal at the Nederlands Fotomuseum grew into an uncomfortable mirror for supervision, legitimacy and public accountability. How visible should supervision actually be in public institutions, and what does it say if it only becomes recognisable when conflict, media and courtroom converge?","rel":"","context":"In "beleid"","block_context":{"text":"beleid","link":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/genre\/beleid\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":98792,"url":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/2025\/10\/rotterdam-baalt-van-oppermachtige-toezichthouder-en-slappe-wethouder-opening-nederlands-fotomuseum-nog-heel-ver-weg\/","url_meta":{"origin":122993,"position":3},"title":"Rotterdam balks at supreme regulator and limp alderman: opening Nederlands Fotomuseum still very far away","author":"Wijbrand Schaap","date":"2 October 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"On Thursday 2 October, the Rotterdam City Council debated the issue of the Fotomuseum. The occasion was the affair that started - in public - with an article in De Volkskrant, which made it clear that a (number of) employee(s) with a long record of service did not get along with director Birgit Donker. Free...","rel":"","context":"In "beleid"","block_context":{"text":"beleid","link":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/genre\/beleid\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Schermafdruk-van-2025-10-02-14-01-12.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Schermafdruk-van-2025-10-02-14-01-12.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Schermafdruk-van-2025-10-02-14-01-12.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Schermafdruk-van-2025-10-02-14-01-12.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Schermafdruk-van-2025-10-02-14-01-12.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Schermafdruk-van-2025-10-02-14-01-12.png?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":101004,"url":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/2026\/03\/het-nederlands-fotomuseum-noemde-het-een-cultuuronderzoek-het-was-een-afrekening\/","url_meta":{"origin":122993,"position":4},"title":"The Dutch Photo Museum called it a cultural survey. It was a reckoning.","author":"Wijbrand Schaap","date":"22 March 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The rather bizarre soap opera surrounding the Nederlands Fotomuseum started a new season this weekend. De Volkskrant published the results of a confidential 'culture survey' conducted by Bureau Unravelling among the staff and former staff of the Nederlands Fotomuseum. The timing of the 'leak' is striking: next Tuesday 24...","rel":"","context":"In "ACTUEEL"","block_context":{"text":"ACTUEEL","link":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/genre\/nieuws\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":98639,"url":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/2025\/09\/open-brief-aan-toezichthouders-nederlands-fotomuseum\/","url_meta":{"origin":122993,"position":5},"title":"Open Letter to Supervisors Netherlands Photo Museum","author":"Wijbrand Schaap","date":"23 September 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"To: Nederlands Fotomuseum Supervisory BoardCC: national newspapersDate: 22 September 2025Concerning: Administrative turmoil and the future of the Nederlands Fotomuseum Dear members of the Supervisory Board, We, photography enthusiasts, stakeholders and professional administrators active in the art sector, have noted with concern the sudden resignation of the director-director of the Nederlands Fotomuseum this summer. Our concerns stand...","rel":"","context":"In "beleid"","block_context":{"text":"beleid","link":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/genre\/beleid\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/nederlands-fotomuseum.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/nederlands-fotomuseum.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/nederlands-fotomuseum.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/nederlands-fotomuseum.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3yKke-vZL","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122993","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=122993"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122993\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":123052,"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122993\/revisions\/123052"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=122993"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=122993"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cultureelpersbureau.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=122993"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}