We at culture press have nuanced views on reviewing. Once upon a time when there were only newspapers, reviews were fairly unique pieces of writing by people appointed by the newspaper to proclaim The View to its so many hundred thousand readers. Since then, those so many hundred thousand readers have become newspapers themselves, and so have about as many reviewers.
The question it ended up being about tonight was: what is the value of a reviewer if you know in advance what his knowledge is. and thus: should you always go back to the same reviewer for your interpretation, or do you go per record, per performance, per concert or exhibition.
Read the twitter discussion here.
English (UK) 
Nederlands 
Français 
