Skip to content

Meg Stuart's 'Sketches/Notebook' frees us from dogged individualism (HF16)

From scene 1, 'Sketches/Notebook' by Meg Stuart and her group Damaged Goods engulfs the audience in a plethora of experiences. Bending over and making quick spins. Swinging a lamp and putting some fellow performers in a circle of light. Making figures with your hands. Laying stones on the floor and walking intently around them. Choosing from richly stocked clothes racks to make a colourful, bizarre creation of yourself. Put up a wall around yourself and then watch what the other does with it: imitate, move, break down, dissolve in space. Playing with beams of light and rope. Running around. Jumping in place. Rattling wildly on and drum kit. Lingering musical motifs.

Sketches-Notebook-©-Iris-Janke-2-

 

From choreographer Meg Stuart has shown work at the Holland Festival before: 'Alibi' (2002) and 'Forgeries, Love and Other Matters' (2004). This year, 'Sketches/Notebook' surprises, being more playful and lighter than her previous work.

From her artistic roots in 1970s New York, Stuart has inherited, among other things, that she sees dance as something collective. A choreography is something that is created collectively and radiates collectivity. She therefore gives all disciplines - illuminators, musicians and costumiers - a role in the performance. In our age of dogged individualism, 'Sketches/Notebook' is liberating and inspiring.

meg stuart, impuls tanz, Wien, 2014 Foto eva wurdinger
meg stuart, impulse tanz, Wien, 2014 Photo eva wurdinger

One by one, the players are performers you want to watch for a long time. You can tell from everything that they are themselves in their playing. However quirky, what they do is not emphatic or demonstrative. The performance is based on improvisations and although much of it is recorded, the casual atmosphere gives the feeling that everything is created on the spot. The performers live out their fantasies, but do not lock themselves in their own brains with it. Every time, the audience is involved in the performance, in a fun, non-intrusive way. Consequently, there is a lot of reaction, especially when one of the performers tells a story that starts at his fingers and eventually encompasses the universe.

The fact that the audience goes along so easily is because the play is so infectious. The show is full of simple, instantly appealing inventions. For instance, suddenly masses of marbles roll across the floor. The group freezes, slowly getting over its surprise. Even as a spectator, I immediately join in the fascination with something as simple as marbles. Then you watch with fascination what the performers ánd the spectators in the front row do with them.

© Iris Janke
© Iris Janke

Another example of something so infectious - to me the thought immediately comes to mind: I want to try this too. Two performers face each other and move their arms stretched forward in exactly the same way up and down, faster and faster. They are not touching each other, but this is contact, funny, focused, exciting and clever.

Thus, it teems with raids. Remarkably, not for a moment does the question occur to me what it all means, even in bizarre moments. It just is what it is.

Sketches Notebook © Omar-Nasser
Sketches Notebook © Omar-Nasser

'Sketches/Notebook' may be lighter than Meg Stuart's earlier work, but amid the playfulness there is still room for seriousness. Meg Stuart herself shines in a dance solo of great poignancy. Meanwhile, the other performers hit the floor and crouch together to form a tightly closed circle. And then - surprisingly and amusingly - Stuart dives into this flower of flesh to disappear completely into it. Stuart calls the performance a series of sketches and therefore fragmentary. That doesn't take away from the fact that there are beautifully crafted developments in it. What happens to that flower of flesh is a fine, compelling example of that.

After the performance, I was home late, too late to start writing this play immediately. I had to leave it overnight. Then I found myself with a problem. The performance had continued unabated in my dream. Space appeared to be limitless. So how could I be sure that all the images and scenes I have touched on here really occur in the performance? In case anything has crept in that did not take place at De Brakke Grond, I hereby apologise. But it's not really a big deal, because even though it comes from my dream, it is ultimately a creation of Meg Stuart and Damaged Goods. And that creation makes me feel good.

Good to know

Seen: 6 June, De Brakke Grond, Amsterdam.
Still to be seen there: 7 and 8 June. Enquiries: Holland Festival.

 

Maarten Baanders

Free-lance arts journalist Leidsch Dagblad. Until June 2012 employee Marketing and PR at the LAKtheater in Leiden.View Author posts

Small Membership
175 / 12 Months
Especially for organisations with a turnover or grant of less than 250,000 per year.
No annoying banners
A premium newsletter
5 trial newsletter subscriptions
All our podcasts
Have your say on our policies
Insight into finances
Exclusive archives
Posting press releases yourself
Own mastodon account on our instance
Cultural Membership
360 / Year
For cultural organisations
No annoying banners
A premium newsletter
10 trial newsletter subscriptions
All our podcasts
Participate
Insight into finances
Exclusive archives
Posting press releases yourself
Own mastodon account on our instance
Collaboration
Private Membership
50 / Year
For natural persons and self-employed persons.
No annoying banners
A premium newsletter
All our podcasts
Have your say on our policies
Insight into finances
Exclusive archives
Own mastodon account on our instance
en_GBEnglish (UK)