Skip to content

Smartphone-less new novel by Stefan Brijs

'A manuscript gets angry if you leave it alone,' Flemish novelist Stefan Brijs (Genk, 1969) once stated in a broadcast of Plastic Radio, referring to his working method. Brijs writes in long, continuous periods in which the writer says he does not even run errands. Recently, Brijs, who broke through internationally with The Angel Maker (2006), his new novel Without love.

Paul has just been left by his wife, Ava has just cast aside her boyfriend. Disappointed in love, the two find each other one night in a movie house and, with the prickliness that indicates genuine affection, a deep but soon unequal friendship develops between them. Faster than Paul realises it, as a reader you feel the love is thoroughly out of step. It takes a third person before Paul himself realises that he has fallen in love with Ava.

Focuskiller

The plot of Without love rushes the reader across the pages, while the language is nonetheless unremarkable or compelling. The outside world is also largely absent: no social observations or stances. The thus theatrical-looking setting of this story does, incidentally, benefit compassion for the main characters. Mere interaction between Paul and Ava drives the plot forward. Even the smartphone is written out of this story, which Without love gives a pleasantly historical glow and looks like a radical statement by Brijs. That absence of the focus-killer of our time gives food for thought. Perhaps a smartphone for a plot is akin to a gun - only deploy it if there really is no other way.

Paul and Ava are given the late-twenties designation, but rather come across as forties. This observation comes from a forty-something who longs for the late twenties, when life was still fundamentally open. I caught myself while reading several times exclaiming to both Paul and Ava: 'come on, don't worry, get over it - anything is still possible!'

Everyday cruelty

Without love Reminiscent of the film classic When Harry Met Sally (1989), about the possibility or impossibility of platonic friendship. Only this time without a happy ending. Bernard, Ava's new love, has slightly sinister traits, which for a brief moment at the end gives this novel the guise of a thriller. This pleasantly adds to the impatience with which you want to read on, and is no doubt deliberately deployed by the author.

Paul's dating woes are very poignantly described. Merciless is the carelessness with which Paul plunges into the world of personals without much faith. The nonchalance on his part, and how it turns out fatally for his two dates, the everyday cruelty of it draws through the reader like a migraine attack. What is clever about this is that neither Paul, Ava, nor the other characters are malicious: as a reader, you understand all the positions, but things still go wrong.

Decisive details

In short: a novel like a classic drama of fate. In which, unfortunately, the side characters are somewhat caricatured, for the benefit of Paul and Ava looking more believable. The way Paul's dates are characterised is a little too simplistic - one gives Antoine de Saint-Exupéry's The Little Prince gift ('wrong', the author winks towards the reader), the other has at home a plot prediction reproduction of Hokusai's The dream of the fisherman's wife hanging above her bed (again, 'wrong'). It annoys me how these characters are so dismissed. At the same time, perhaps those raunchy judgements are also exactly the details by which the success or failure of a date is decided.

The weightlessness, or rather unhealthily detached manner with which Paul strides through life closely resembles depression. If Brijs seems to want to say something with this novel, perhaps it is this: love is impossible in the midst of the vacuum of depression. Attempting to do so anyway: that will only result in victims.

Appreciate this article!

Happy with this story? Show your appreciation with a small contribution! That's how you help keep independent cultural journalism alive. (If you don't see a button below, use this link: donation!)

Donate smoothly
Donate

Why donate?

We are convinced that good investigative journalism and expert background information are essential for a healthy cultural sector. There is not always space and time for that. Culture Press does want to provide that space and time, and keep it accessible to everyone for FREE! Whether you are rich, or poor. Thanks to donations From readers like you, we can continue to exist. This is how Culture Press has existed since 2009!

You can also become a member, then turn your one-off donation into lasting support!

Wijbrand Schaap

Cultural journalist since 1996. Worked as theatre critic, columnist and reporter for Algemeen Dagblad, Utrechts Nieuwsblad, Rotterdams Dagblad, Parool and regional newspapers through Associated Press Services. Interviews for TheaterMaker, Theatererkrant Magazine, Ons Erfdeel, Boekman. Podcast maker, likes to experiment with new media. Culture Press is called the brainchild I gave birth to in 2009. Life partner of Suzanne Brink roommate of Edje, Fonzie and Rufus. Search and find me on Mastodon.View Author posts

Small Membership
175 / 12 Months
Especially for organisations with a turnover or grant of less than 250,000 per year.
No annoying banners
A premium newsletter
5 trial newsletter subscriptions
All our podcasts
Have your say on our policies
Insight into finances
Exclusive archives
Posting press releases yourself
Own mastodon account on our instance
Cultural Membership
360 / Year
For cultural organisations
No annoying banners
A premium newsletter
10 trial newsletter subscriptions
All our podcasts
Participate
Insight into finances
Exclusive archives
Posting press releases yourself
Own mastodon account on our instance
Collaboration
Private Membership
50 / Year
For natural persons and self-employed persons.
No annoying banners
A premium newsletter
All our podcasts
Have your say on our policies
Insight into finances
Exclusive archives
Own mastodon account on our instance
en_GBEnglish (UK)