Skip to content

This Was The News is more enjoyable without an audience than Sunday with Lubach

You already read here free messages. So join Culture Press now. We have more than 400 loyal members. People involved in the arts, working in it, setting policy. People who value an independent view of arts journalism. Just like you.

Join NOW To keep Culture Press going!

We must continue to get through the already theatre-less weekends this spring and summer without Sunday with Lubach and This Was The News. Their season is over. The latter remained witty without an audience, Lubach in my opinion did not. How did that happen?

Five weeks ago, when the shows first recorded it without an audience, it was striking that Sunday with Lubach had lost something except that audience. The entire broadcast was dedicated to instilling in the viewing public that they should keep one-and-a-half metres between themselves. In terms of content, it became a PO Box 51, in terms of tone a preacher's sermon. Which, by the way, a large proportion of our cabaret performers know how to score with; they know so damn well what is wrong in and with our lives and will put it right for a while.

Just hold your judgement on Lubach, I thought. Especially since it is so sad when, as a performer, you are affected by Corona measures such as playing without an audience. Besides, it could also be down to this viewer that Sunday with Lubach didn't strike a chord. N=1, those I watched with were less affected.

Ajax out of shape

But it didn't get any better for me. Lubach sat at the table with Tex de Wit and Janine Abbring like a vicar with his elders, the good Jeanine with headphones for unsuspected reasons, Tex with the pleasant mug of the cuckolded husband. During those five weeks, Lubach himself came off with difficulty. The third broadcast was a huge relief for me. Thanks to filleting RUMAG. and momentum in the programme, it was old-fashioned enjoyment again.

Arjen complained in the first broadcast about remote working by the editors of Zondag met Lubach. That includes great humorists such as Diederik Smit (the best we have), Jonathan van het Reve and Edo Schoonbeek. That is no guarantee of success; Ajax also has lousy periods. Analysts - who are called analytics - have all kinds of explanations for this, but you don't really have any idea what it is.

I did wonder why nothing was done about the stiff set-up. Lubach is not inherently witty, and already lacks the look of John Oliver who makes you laugh just seeing him. Now Lubach is not an a priori humourist, but a razor-sharp critic, so you can't compare the programmes one-to-one. However, I did notice that Lubach lacks an important trait of the good humourist: self-mockery.

Pannekoek, Edens and Van der Wal

And that is precisely what makes the difference with Dit Was Het Nieuws. Peter Pannekoek, Jan Jaap van der Wal and especially presenter Harm Edens see no point in making a monkey out of themselves. I think this makes the programme so unique that it is already such a 25 years along with it. It is also inherently witty: the scripted jokes with lyrics are high-level, while the spontaneous contributions regularly make me giggle and are sometimes razor-sharp. Like last weekend's observation that many parents find out with homeschooling that their children are slightly less brilliant than they had always thought.

Guests, whether they bring humour or not, often contribute nicely to the programme because they understand the art of stating, like last weekend's Leonie ter Braak. Who, incidentally, dwarfed Sjaak Bral, but that doesn't matter. Of course, Pannekoek is dominant, but he is also just a terribly witty, intelligent joker; even if he shows grumpiness due to sitting inside for a long time, and that he has "been without sex for three months" as he said himself. And presenter Harm Edens gets better the older he gets, as he becomes more witty in his handling of the role of victim and is also happy to accept gay jokes. And now wields 'the laugh button' with verve, found as sublime as it is simple by the makers.

On 25 April, BNNVara kicks off Even Tot Hier again, also without an audience and without a complete band from Belgium. You hold your heart for Niels van der Laan and Jeroen Woe, who are not so keen on spontaneity. But watch Dit Was het Nieuws and also Beau on RTL4: improvise and don't take yourself too seriously, dear editors with Peter Heerschop, Peter Capel, Emilio Guzman, Owen Schumacher and Armèn Hakhverdian.

Incidentally, all men too, where are the female writers for said shows?

 

Peter Olsthoorn

Freelance journalist, does interviews and science for Intermediair; writes and speaks on topics including digitisation, data analytics, fraud and media for dailies/congresses; reviews theatre; and is daily grateful.View Author posts

Private Membership (month)
5€ / Maand
For natural persons and self-employed persons.
No annoying banners
A special newsletter
Own mastodon account
Access to our archives
Small Membership (month)
18€ / Maand
For cultural institutions with a turnover/subsidy of less than €250,000 per year
No annoying banners
A premium newsletter
All our podcasts
Your own Mastodon account
Access to archives
Posting press releases yourself
Extra attention in news coverage
Large Membership (month)
36€ / Maand
For cultural institutions with a turnover/subsidy of more than €250,000 per year.
No annoying banners
A special newsletter
Your own Mastodon account
Access to archives
Share press releases with our audience
Extra attention in news coverage
Premium Newsletter (substack)
5 trial subscriptions
All our podcasts

Payments are made via iDeal, Paypal, Credit Card, Bancontact or Direct Debit. If you prefer to pay manually, based on an invoice in advance, we charge a 10€ administration fee

*Only for annual membership or after 12 monthly payments

en_GBEnglish (UK)